Tate Liang

Home

AboutAbout ⏷
Cambridge <- New York <- Vancouver

Architecture ⚡︎ Bookmaking ⚡︎ Film ⚡︎ Watercolour/Pastel ⚡︎ Python ⚡︎ Java ⚡︎ Swift ⚡︎ HTML/CSS/JS

2027 M.Arch II Harvard GSD ☆ 2025 B.Arch -> The Cooper Union ☆ 2025/2023 Intern -> Diller Scofidio + Renfro ☆ 2024 Intern -> OMA ☆ 2025 -> AIA Medal for Academic Excellence ☆ 2024 ->  KPF Travelling Fellowship ☆ 2024 -> Arthur Thomson AR'64 Thesis Fellowship ☆ 2024 -> AIA New York Eleanor Allwork Scholarship ☆ 2023 -> US D.O.E Solar Decathlon Grand Prize ☆ 2020 -> Swift Student Challenge Winner

ContactContact ⏷
Email -> tate_liang@gsd.harvard.edu ☆ Instagram -> @tateliang ☆ Github -> TateLiang
———————————————————————
Portfolio & CV available on request

Living Together

Integrated Housing Studio / Spring 2023
––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
Baltimore, Maryland
Professors Mersiha Veledar, Daisy Ames, Nader Tehrani

As globalization encounters living practices from diverse cultures, backgrounds and ideologies that question the nuclear family, this housing project proposes a new typology that redefines unit boundaries, flexibility and linkages between families and their larger communities. Openings that puncture a perimeter unit condition invite public events to the block interior, where a central volume houses a theatre and educational programs. To maintain privacy facing the street and intimacy facing the internal courtyard, this project uses a rollable mesh with a minimal profile one one side and a shifting balcony system on the other. 

Traditional double-loaded circulatory spines are reimagined into shared activity spaces by enlarging public areas and creating vertical cuts that allow access to natural light and views. A new modality where separate units are linked by balconies captures multigenerational and modern living arrangements, allowing connection while retaining individuality. A continuous public promenade spirals sectionally through each complex, leading residents to a central public volume. An urban analysis reveals Baltimore’s challenging history of redlining, and the unequal distribution of urban “open space” in predominately well-off neighbourhoods, while being confined to small grid interventions elsewhere.